CONTACT US   SUBSCRIPTION INFO.   LETTER TO THE EDITOR  BUY! PHOTOS EMAIL UPDATES  Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

ARCHIVE
SEARCH

Advanced Search

Updated Wednesday, April 25, 2007

ARCHIVES

Weather Sponsored By:



MARKETPLACE

All Classifieds
Find a Home
Find a Car
Find a Job
Work Here
Find Merchandise
Business Directory
Today’s Print Ads

Place an ad
in print and online, 24/7







Advertisement



ARCHIVES

Fired child social worker wins job back

A Santa Barbara County child welfare social worker who was fired last year for using a false name in an attempt to spend an anonymous night as a homeless woman in a Lompoc shelter has won her job back.

Liann Noble, who was represented by the Service Employees International Union, said Tuesday the county Civil Service Commission notified her last week that it had ruled in her favor.

“I feel great about getting back to work,” said Noble, a county social worker for more than a decade. “All I've wanted to do is work with children and families in our community. It was very difficult to watch things happen in the town like gangs and the children dying from the drug using and abuse, and sit back and not be able to help my fellow co-workers and the police. I've just had to sit back and go, ‘There's nothing I can do.' That was really difficult.”

The Civil Service Commission agreed with Noble and the union that her termination was unfounded.

“The Commission felt that the termination was not given due process of any progressive discipline, which is the normal process, and that the termination was excessive,” said union representative Pamela Meadows.

“The department rushed to judgment without really doing a thorough investigation on their own and not listening to all the facts. They caved to local political pressure to terminate Liann, when in fact, any personal wrongdoing on her part did not warrant her losing her job and her being terminated,” Meadows said.

Noble said she doesn't know when she can return to work, or whether she'll be allowed to return to the same position.

Advertisement

“I assume I'm going back to my job as a social services abuse investigator unless I am told otherwise,” she said.

Noble said in her six years as a county employee, she has had an “outstanding record of exemplary employment with no disciplinary action in my file or history.”

Noble earlier said she wanted to spend a night at Bridgehouse anonymously to research child homelessness and to publish an article alerting the community, so she checked into the shelter on Saturday, Sept. 23, with her 10-year-old son.

A false name was necessary, she said, because residents would be reluctant to trust a child-welfare social worker. She said she brought her son to make it easier “to connect from one parent to another.”

Staff workers at the shelter quickly learned who she was and asked her to leave. They also called the Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Department.

Sue Ehrlich, head of the Lompoc Housing and Community Development Corp., which runs the shelter, sent a letter three days later to the District Attorney's Office, asking that Noble “be prosecuted for her actions to the full extent of the law.”

Social Services Deputy Director Ken Jensen said Tuesday he could not comment on personnel matters.

In a dismissal letter dated Oct. 11, 2006, and effective Oct. 27, 2006, Jensen told Noble that her actions could adversely affect the cases of her clients.

“The fact that you have lied in this instance has now called into question the veracity of information you have provided in court reports regarding your Child Welfare Services clients,” Jensen wrote.

On Tuesday, Ehrlich said she hopes that Noble is now able to “move on.”

“Quite frankly I had not given it the slightest thought about this for months,” Ehrlich said. “The only thing I feel is we moved on and we hope this allows her to move on.”

Neil Nisperos can be reached at 737-1059 or nnisperos@lompoc record.com.

April 25, 2007


POST A COMMENT

Comment policy:
SantaMariaTimes.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. We will never edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to remove comments that violate our code of conduct. No comment may contain:

  • Potentially libelous statements; such as accusing somebody of a crime, defamation of character, or statements that can harm somebody's reputation.
  • Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
  • Personal attacks, insults, threats, harassment or inciting violence.
  • Commercial product promotions.

Please view our Commenting Policy

If you have any questions, please contact our moderator.
Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments.

 
Current Word Count:
   

23 comment(s)

Gloria T wrote on Apr 25, 2007 7:04 AM:

" I can't believe the county is so stupid they don't even investigate a complaint before they fire a much needed social worker in this town? We have social big problems going on here. Is politics really more important than protecting children? Great. now we have just paid for Ms Noble to stay at home. WHo are the decision makers in this case? "

Billy Jean wrote on Apr 25, 2007 8:50 AM:

" Finally justice prevails. I'm curious and will follow this case in the future to find out what kjnd of punitive damages are awarded to Liann. She was obviously wronged, and the system allows for monetary damages to rectify the situation.... I am curious to find out if the civil wrongful termination case (that could and should be filed) will be settled out of court or will go to a jury trial. Liann was wronged, and is due her day in court! Wouldn't it be interesting to see Erlich defend her position in court? Especially now that she comments she hasn't thought about it for months? Wreck someone's career without a care? Shame on you, Erlich!!! "

Adrianna wrote on Apr 25, 2007 10:14 AM:

" Ehrlich states "“Quite frankly I had not given it the slightest thought about this for months,” Ehrlich said. “The only thing I feel is we moved on and we hope this allows her to move on.” Yea right. You blew this situation out of porprotion and almost had an excellent social worker lose her career. Now your gonna act like its no big deal when she gets her job back. You were wrong, admit it. Im glad Leanne is back. "

Joy wrote on Apr 25, 2007 10:30 AM:

" I think it was great that someone cares enough to risk her job to go check, what is going on in our city. "

M.A. wrote on Apr 25, 2007 10:52 AM:

" I am very happy to learn about the outcome on Liann Noble's case. Instead of prosecuting her actions that in the first place were intended to help a population that is ignored and underserved for the most part, we should be happy that she was willing to study this population in order to improve some aspects of their life and difficult living situation. The homeless population is higher than it should be every year, and committed people like Ms. Noble are needed to help us figure out better ways to help and assist the homeless population so they can re-integrate into society as productive and healthier individuals. "

Allison C. wrote on Apr 25, 2007 10:57 AM:

" This women is a hero and the people she works for are idiots. That women who got her fired, she have to answer. That social worker should sue, ( no pun intended) that owner of the homeless shelter, Sue Eurlick. You go social worker, Noble. "

Concerned Citizen wrote on Apr 25, 2007 3:45 PM:

" I am very glad that justice was served in this case. I am not sure, however, why Bridge House and its conditions have not been further investigated. Why is money going toward a theater when the beds are possibly unsafe? We are talking about children. "

Stetz wrote on Apr 25, 2007 7:49 PM:

" Congrats, this is what unions are for. This entire incident was management going too far with PC. An obvious over reaction. This is what happens when management forgets their employees are real people too. Now just watch your back, cus' you know the headhunters are! :-) "

Lupe M. concerned wrote on Apr 26, 2007 9:16 AM:

" This is just another waste of money. I checked the website to a Social worker practioner and she makes $27 an hour...the county has to pay her back pay for seven months and legal costs....I guess social services does have more money than they know what to do with. This makes no sense. THe real question is how did an uninvestigated complaint cause this much drama. THe people at the top are real smart. "

Zarith wrote on Apr 26, 2007 11:51 AM:

" Congrats Liann and shame on Sue Ehrilch and those who were involved from the Bridgehouse. Liann's intent was always to help the homeless population especially the children. There was never any attempt to harm the Bridgehouse in any way. What still concerns me is, what were those involved with in all this trying to hide when the attempt was made to make Liann look as if she had committed a crime. It's terrible to think that so much time and money was wasted to defend an employee who should have never been terminated. Hold your head high Liann and thank you for advocating for those who are unable to speak for themselves. "

James P. "Lawyer" wrote on Apr 26, 2007 7:00 PM:

" Social worker named Noble----mean women with political ties, named Sue----If I practiced personal injury, I would be contacting Noble to SUE Sue E.....and the County...$$$$$$$. It will be interesting to see how the county handles social worker Noble. I would guess she will now write her ticket to bigger things than CWS Lompoc. "

Diego A wrote on Apr 26, 2007 7:40 PM:

" I read with great interest and pleasure that Ms. Noble won her job back. What was DSS thinking? I worked for many years in that agency and it appears nothing's changed. Management and administrative staff are still idiots. From all accounts Ms. Noble is an excellent and dedicated worker and she was fired for doing what social workers do, trying to help children and families. When this initially came out in the media, and based on the information I read, as well as my experience having worked for that department I privately predicted the outcome for Ms. Noble. It was her word against the word of a person with political connections (Ms. Erlich) and it was very easy to predict who would win. DSS has a history of never supporting their workers. They'll role over when political pressure is placed on them. They talk the talk of being a team but never walk the walk. It was very generous of Ms. Erlich to say she has "moved on" after trying to destroy someone's career and livelyhood. I hope Ms. Noble also moves on and destroy's Ms. Erlich's ability to steal money from the poor. If this paper wants a story, they should investigate Ms. Erlich's motives for overreacting like she did and DSS' motives for summarily firing Ms. Noble. You might have a good story regarding Ms. Erlich, unfortunately the story regarding DSS might just boil down to their administrative and management level staff being plain stupid. "

Lynn H wrote on Apr 26, 2007 7:55 PM:

" Sue Ehrlich has not given this the slightest thought in months? After she wrote the scathing letter to the DA that said she wanted Ms. Noble prosecuted "to the fullest extent of the law"? How shallow can she be at not giving it a second thought after she has ended someone's career? Guess she's too busy working on her lovely little "theater project". With all the the social problems that we have in this town, the LAST thing we need to spend taxpayers' dollars on is renovating a theater! A total waste of our money that could be going to programs that could actually HELP problems going on within our community. "

Evelyn P wrote on Apr 26, 2007 7:59 PM:

" It just makes you wonder, "What does the Bridgehouse have to hide?" Unless they were hiding something why on earth would they get so upset about this? It definitely makes me want to look into thier non-profit and see what's REALLY going on!!!! "

Caroline Forbes, LCSW wrote on Apr 26, 2007 8:04 PM:

" How interesting that Sue Ehrlich formally called for a criminal prosecution for an action in which there was, at the end of the day, no criminal intent nor liability, and then blithely comments - months later- that she hadn't given it " a second thought" for months. Did she not know that Ms. Noble's profession and income had been ruined? Although Liann is now redeemed - at great personal and financial and emotional costs - , how interesting it is that Ehrlich could have acted so thoughtlessly and precipitously and then not even have been aware - as she purports to not have been - of the dire and ridiculous consequences of her actions. Which, by the way, were done at great public cost. But I suppose thousands of dollars of public funds expended to persecute one of the best and most dedicated public servants is probably not something to which she would "give a second thought". I wonder how many children went unprotected while Liann was off the front line. It appears Ehrlich herself "moved on" after she did the damage and didn't even have the cognitive fortitude to perceive the harm she had caused. Caroline Forbes, LCSW professional child protective services social worker for twelve years "

Maria T wrote on Apr 26, 2007 8:05 PM:

" Congratulations to Leanne Nobel! She is a dedicated public servant and a crusader for children and families in our town. I am so very happy that justice prevails in this instance! Shame on the Bridgehouse staff for making a big deal out of this and attempting to bring down Mrs. Nobel's career! It looks like some dirty politics may have been involved which is very sad. "

Sue Ann J wrote on Apr 26, 2007 8:09 PM:

" What in the world is going on at our homeless shelter? In the past, I made regular donations to them, but since this incident, I sense that somthing shady is going on. I really don't understand, but I think in time the truth will come out. "

John Childs wrote on Apr 26, 2007 8:13 PM:

" I applaud Ms. Noble for her ability to withstand the storm and come out with her feet firmly planted on the ground and ready to take up her career where she left off. I am sorry she had to go through this but maybe her victory will save other SB County Employees from sensless acts of termination with no basis whatsoever. "

Nancy Fazio wrote on Apr 27, 2007 5:11 AM:

" I can't believe that the due process for termination of an employee was not used. I work for a hospital and if we did not follow the 3 disciplinary action forms we would be penalized. She was trying to help the families and children in the area by investigating the problems in the shelter . I can't believe she was fired. I feel nothing for the better seems to change without someone being the scapegoat and suffering loss of job and reputation. How sad. Is this what our country has become?Those that fight for right and justice are the criminals and the criminals are the victims. She should get her job back and be compensated for loss of wages and reputation. "

Jack Boot wrote on Apr 28, 2007 9:27 AM:

" How interesting that Ms. Ehrlich thought Liann's actions were so serious that she insisted she be "prosecuted for her actions to the fullest extent of the law" and thus nearly ruined Liann's career....but she herself, hasn't given it the "slightest thought" for months.....and to think Ms. Ehrlich has so much power where money for our community goes - she doesn't even live in our community! The real question that someone should look into, is what was it she was afraid Liann was uncovering? Maybe someone should check into that....... "

Liann Noble Ponce wrote on Apr 30, 2007 8:38 PM:

" I am really floored by the support and comments. My deepest appreciation goes out to those who stood by me when I got swept off my feet by the events over the last seven months. As much as I am amazed at the department of social services managers to humiliate and punish me for activism and free speech in my off duty hours... I do not think it would be right to pursue legal action other than the civil service process. It has already cost taxpayers big bucks. If I did seek compensation from DSS, they would most likely take the money from the number of social workers, services or needy clients. If I thought for a moment they would downsize their corrupt management team to cover the cost of a wrongful termination suit. I would do it in a hearbeat. They have shown many social workers and the community they have no apparent concern for their workers or more importantly, the conditions that children and families are subjected to in Lompoc. As far as those who pushed for the "full extent of the law"...well -what can I say- all that I feel have already been stated. I am a believer in karma. "

another civil servant wrote on May 4, 2007 3:29 PM:

" It is a shame that the individuals in power feel that they can bypass the rules and regulations that are in place to protect workers from personal biases from the administration. I work as an investigator for a state agency and the fact is that even if I don't personally care for an individual that I am investigating, I must remain unbiased and present BOTH sides of the issue. It is unfair and unethical to take action against anyone based upon whether someone in power likes or dislikes that person. I urge the individuals that made the decision to take action against Liann Noble to reassess their motivation for the extreme discipline. My understanding is that these individuals are also civil servants and as such, they should realize that they are compelled to be fair and unbiased and hold the county's best interest in mind at all times. Did they use their best judgement in terminating Ms. Noble's employment? How much money did they waste that could have been spent on improving the lives of the children in Santa Barbara County? The taxpayers of the county should demand that these individuals be re-educated in an ethics in the workplace class. This whole affair was an example of unethical behavior by people who believed that their personal beliefs outweighed the State of California's employment rules and laws. As for Sue Erlich, what was she expecting Ms. Noble to be prosecuted for? Stealing free food? Speaking to homeless people without permission? Occupying space in a facility paid for by taxpayer money, of which also comes from Ms. Noble's paycheck? If you had nothing to hide, what would it matter if an individual came in to a shelter to investigate. Perhaps a better idea would have been for Ms. Erlich to show Ms. Noble around and answer any questions she had to show that the shelter was doing the best it could to take care of the residents. Hindsight is 20/20. No one is perfect. But when you are in a position of authority you must think through the consequences of your actions. Every action has a consequence. Some consequences can be avoided by thinking BEFORE you act, not acting before you think. I hope that all the individuals involved in this situation have learned something valuable that can be used for the good of all. "

E. Social Worker wrote on Jul 4, 2007 10:18 AM:

" Just saw the story in the CA-NASW paper regarding this situation, and congratulations on presumably getting your job back. If this is the same Liann Noble who once worked in Stanislaus County, I heard nothing but good things about you during my employment there. How interesting that as student in a California State University MSW course we were given an assignment to visit shelters, AA meetings, and other community service agencies to get a feel for what it's like to be a client in need. To visit such a community site anonymously provides for the most accurate representation of what a program is about. How better to help a client than to know what their own experience coould be like and know that you are providing them accurate information to assist with their needs? It's too bad this situation didn't get more press at the time, and it's incredibly shameful if your county's administration didn't back you up more throughly based on what I've read thus far. "





SEARCH ARTICLE ARCHIVES

  
Advanced Search





Translate to another language

Lee Central Coast Newspapers

Santa Maria Times Lompoc Record Times Press Recorder Adobe Press Santa Ynez Valley News El Tiempo

Letter to the Editor | Comment about Website

Contact The Lompoc Record
Main Phone: 805-736-2313

Copyright © 2009 Lee Central Coast Newspapers. All Rights Reserved.
All Lee Central Coast Newspapers pages are designed for Firefox 2.0 and Internet Explorer 6 or 7 with screen resolutions set at 1024x768 or higher.
Click here for our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use applicable to this site.